Skip to main content
Log in

A Survey of Dictionary Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Its Application for Glaucoma Diagnosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dictionary learning has shown its effectiveness in computer vision with the concise expression form but the powerful representation. Dictionary learning represents images with a bag of visual words (BoVW), which is a collection of atoms expressively representative for images. Recently, several task-specific dictionary learning methods have been proposed and successfully applied in medical image analysis, such as de-noising, classification, segmentation, and so on, which promotes the development of computer-aided diagnosis. In this paper, first we give a survey for dictionary learning-based medical image analysis methods including: (1) three discriminative dictionary learning frameworks, (2) CT image de-noising based on dictionary learning, and (3) histopathological image classification using sparse representation. Then, a novel method named Low-rank Shared Dictionary Learning (LRSDL), is presented to achieve accurate glaucoma diagnosis on fundus images. The LRSDL generates a shared codebook for image reconstruction and a particular one to handle the difference between the healthy and glaucomatous images. Benefit from this strategy, LRSDL not only possess distinct glaucoma-related features, but also share common patterns among all the fundus images. Experimental results show that the method effectively delivers glaucoma diagnosis with the accuracy of 92.90%. This endows dictionary learning method a great potential for glaucoma diagnosis and proves the feasibility of its application to medical image analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan A, Doucette JA, Cohen R, Lizotte DJ (2012) Integrating machine learning into a medical decision support system to address the problem of missing patient data. In: 2012 11th international conference on machine learning and applications, Boca Raton, FL, pp 454–457

  2. Seixas JL, Barbon S, Mantovani RG (2015) Pattern recognition of lower member skin ulcers in medical images with machine learning algorithms. In: 2015 IEEE 28th international symposium on computer-based medical systems, Sao Carlos, pp 50–53

  3. Mothkur R, Km P (2018) Machine learning will transfigure medical sector: a survey. In: 2018 international conference on current trends towards converging technologies (ICCTCT), Coimbatore, pp 1–8

  4. Song L, Peng J (2012) Dictionary learning research based on sparse representation. In: 2012 international conference on computer science and service system, Nanjing, pp 14–17

  5. Zhang CZ, Zhao L (2011) Image de-noising based on learned dictionary. In: 2011 International conference on multimedia technology, Hangzhou, pp 3101–3104

  6. Yu F, Chen Y, Luo L (2013) CT image denoising based on sparse representation using global dictionary. In: 2013 ICME International conference on complex medical engineering, Beijing, pp 408–411

  7. Chen Y, Yin X, Shi L et al (2013) Improving abdomen tumor low-dose CT images using a fast dictionary learning based processing. Phys Med Biol 58:5803–5820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi L, Chen Y, Shu H, Luo L, Toumoulin C, Coatrieux J (2014) Low-dose CT image processing using artifact suppressed dictionary learning. In: 2014 IEEE 11th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), Beijing 2014, pp 1127–1130

  9. Shan B, Hao W, Zhao R (2012) Infrared image de-noising based on K-SVD over-complete dictionaries learning. In: 2012 5th international congress on image and signal processin, Chongqing 2012, pp 316–320

  10. Ji J, Ren F, Ji H, Yao Y, Hou G (2018) Generalised non-locally centralised image de-noising using sparse dictionary. IET Image Process 12(7):1072–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vu TH, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Rao G, Rao UKA (2016) Histopathological Image Classification Using Discriminative Feature-Oriented Dictionary Learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(3):738–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu M et al (2011) Sparse classification for computer aided diagnosis using learned dictionaries. Proc Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv (MICCAI) 6893:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas U, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Hattel A, Jayarao B (2014) Simultaneous sparsity model for histopathological image representation and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imag 33(5):1163–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bai J, Song S, Fan T et al (2018) Medical image denoising based on sparse dictionary learning and cluster ensemble. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2853-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun X, Nasrabadi NM, Tran TD (2015) Task-driven dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification with structured sparsity constraints. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(8):4457–4471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diamant I, Klang E, Amitai M, Konen E, Goldberger J, Greenspan H (2017) Task-driven dictionary learning based on mutual information for medical image classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(6):1380–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang HZ, Li X, Zhang XG, Zhang DB, Wang X, Mao LZ (2018) Discriminative feature-oriented dictionary learning method with Fisher criterion for histopathological image classification. Acta Autom Sin 44(10):1842–1853

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vu TH, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Rao UKA, Rao G (2015) DFDL: Discriminative feature-oriented dictionary learning for histopathological image classification. In: IEEE 12th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), New York, NY, pp 990-994

  19. Srinivas U, Mousavi HS, Jeon C, Monga V, Hattel A (2013) SHIRC: A simultaneous sparsity model for histopathological image representation and classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium biomedical imaging, pp 1118–1121

  20. Li X, MongaV , Rao UKA (2018) Analysis-synthesis model learning with shared features: a new framework for histopathological image classification. In: 2018 IEEE 15th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, pp 203–206

  21. Roy S et al (2015) Subject-specific sparse dictionary learning for atlas-based brain MRI segmentation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19(5):1598–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shi Y, Wang D, Liu Z (2015) Hippocampus segmentation in MR images using sparse patch representation and discriminative dictionary learning. In: IET international conference on biomedical image and signal processing (ICBISP 2015), Beijing, pp 1–5

  23. Guo Y, Zhan Y, Gao Y, Jiang J, Shen D (2013) MR prostate segmentation via distributed discriminative dictionary (DDD) learning. In: 2013 IEEE 10th international symposium on biomedical imaging, San Francisco, CA, pp 868–871

  24. Dong Y, Hansen PC, Kjer HM (2018) Joint CT reconstruction and segmentation with discriminative dictionary learning. IEEE Trans Comput Imag 4(4):528–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jin P, Ye DH, Bouman CA (2015) Joint metal artifact reduction and segmentation of CT images using dictionary-based image prior and continuous-relaxed potts model. In :2015 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), Quebec City, QC, pp 798–802

  26. Onofrey JA, Staib LH, Papademetris X (2019) Segmenting the brain surface from CT images with artifacts using locally oriented appearance and dictionary learning. IEEE Trans Med Imag 38(2):596–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright J, Yang A, Ganesh A, Sastry S, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31:210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A (2006) K-SVD: an algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 54(11):4311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Q, Li B (2010) Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition. In: 2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Francisco, CA, pp 2691–2698

  30. Jiang Z, Lin Z, Davis LS (2013) Label consistent K-SVD: learning a discriminative dictionary for recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(11):2651–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang M, Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D (2011) Fisher discrimination dictionary learning for sparse representation. In: 2011 International conference on computer vision, Barcelona, pp 543–550

  32. Vu TH, Monga V (2017) Fast low-rank shared dictionary learning for image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(11):5160–5175

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Roodhooft J (2002) Leading causes of blindness worldwide. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 283:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  34. Michelson G, Hornegger J, Wärntges S, Lausen B (2008) The papilla as screeningparameter for early diagnosis of glaucoma. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int 105:334–35

    Google Scholar 

  35. Haleem MS, Han L, Hemert JV, Li B (2013a) Automatic extraction of retinal features from colour retinal images for glaucoma diagnosis: a review. Comput Med Imag Graph 37:581–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khalil T, Khalid S, Syed AM (2014) Review of machine learning techniques for glaucoma detection and prediction. In: Science and information conference, London, pp 438–442

  37. Nawaldgi S (2016) Review of automated glaucoma detection techniques. In: 2016 international conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET), Chennai, pp 1435–1438

  38. Yin F et al (2012) Automated segmentation of optic disc and optic cup in fundus images for glaucoma diagnosis. In: 2012 25th IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS), Rome, pp 1–6

  39. Cheng J, Yin F, Wong DWK, Tao D, Liu J (2015) Sparse dissimilarity-constrained coding for glaucoma screening. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(5):1395–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Poshtyar A, Shanbehzadeh J, Ahmadieh H (2013) Automatic measurement of cup to disc ratio for diagnosis of glaucoma on retinal fundus images. In: 2013 6th international conference on biomedical engineering and informatics, Hangzhou, pp 24–27

  41. Zhao R, Chen Z, Duan X, Chen Q, Liu K, Zhu C (2017) Automated glaucoma detection based on multi-channel features from color fundus images. J Comput Aided Des Comput Graph 29:998–1006

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fu H, Cheng J, Xu Y, Zhang C, Wong DWK, Liu J, Cao X (2018) Disc-aware ensemble network for glaucoma screening from fundus image. IEEE Trans Med Imag 37(11):2493–2501

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by NSFC (Grant Numbers 61702558, 61602527), Hunan Natural Science Foundation (Grant Numbers 2017JJ3411, 2017JJ3416), Primary Research & Developement Plan of Hunan Province (Grant Number 2017WK2074), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Number 2017YFC0840104), China Scholarship Council (Grant Number 201806375006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiyao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Li, H. & Liu, X. A Survey of Dictionary Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Its Application for Glaucoma Diagnosis. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 463–471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09383-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09383-3

Navigation